Gender - Situation Analysis
A situation analysis conducted in 2007 identified the key risks and harm reduction needs among different sexes and populations. This section contains a breakdown of these risk and needs.
HIV vulnerabilities are frequently different for men, women, boys and girls:
- Men who inject drugs are a potential bridge to the general population via sexual transmission to regular partners (male, female, transgender);
- HIV positive male injecting drug users in detention can transmit HIV via unprotected sex;
- Injecting drug use among sex workers (female and male) appears to be growing;
- Sex workers (especially street-based) who inject drugs are more likely to share equipment and not use condoms;
- Gatekeepers and stigma towards "deviant" female injecting drug users make them harder to reach;
- Asian cultural concepts of trust and fate may be obstacles for adoption of safer sex/injecting;
- Widows of injecting drug users/AIDS are more likely to become destitute due to illness costs, and lack of property rights, possibly leading to sex work for survival.
Important evidence gaps exist, including:
- Drug use patterns among women and men (initiation, dependence, sharing behaviours, treatment opportunities and outcomes);
- Nexus between injecting drug use and commercial sex: where, why and how;
- Women's special harm reduction needs related to reproduction and stigma;
- Masculine norms and risk-taking;
- Risks for transgender individuals.
Current Harm reduction programs lack gender sensitivity, for example:
- Most focus on risks of injecting drug use, ignoring sexual risks;
- Few address risks associated with masculinity;
- Insufficient peer outreach and drop-in services, especially for women;
- Generic 'male' model less likely to be used by women;
- Few models address gatekeepers who inhibit women's access;
- Regional and national programs often overlook gender dimensions;
- Male and female injecting drug users/sex workers are rarely consulted or involved in programming;
- Skills in gender analysis are limited and often not utilised in program design and implementation.
|